fallacies, put out against us? why Maria Monk, and Jeffreys, and Teodore, and Achilli? Allowing, then, as I do, the importance of the phenomenon which I have been mentioning, feeling most fully that it requires careful consideration, granting that we may be fairly asked what we have to say to it—that we ought to account for its existence, nevertheless I do not think it is so decisive an argument, as its own upholders would make it, else it ought to have altogether superseded all others. In truth,